BACK TO TOP

We are hiring! Operations Administrator (Finance)

Role Details

Job Title: Operations Administrator (Finance)

Salary: £31,200 pro rata FTE

Hours: 21 hours per week (3 days)

Place of work: Remote

Contract type: Permanent

Application closing date:  Tuesday 4th April (midnight)

Interview date: Thursday 13th April

Start date (negotiable): 12th June

Job Purpose

Coal Action Network  is seeking an experienced operations administrator, with a particular focus on finance, to support a small but growing flat-structured staff team following our transition to a formalised employer status with PAYE.

As well as carrying out daily tasks to maintain the organisation's finances and legal compliance as an employer, you will be empowered to improve, design, and implement systems to make the organisation function optimally.

As part of a non hierarchical organisation you will have equal agency as other members of CAN in key decisions affecting the organisation . Upon passing probationary period, you will have the option to become a Co-Director of the organisation.

How to Apply

Please read Recruitment pack Operations Administrator (Finance) before applying for this role. This includes Role Responsibilities and Person Specification, and more details on the application process.

  • Please provide a CV and up to two pages of text addressing how you meet the points in the person specification, giving examples of relevant experience (paid or voluntary).

 

  • Please provide contact details (email and phone number) of two referees who can comment on your suitability for the role (in a paid or voluntary capacity, not a family member or partner/spouse).

 

 

The application closing date is Tuesday 4th April (midnight)

We are hiring! Campaigner Fossil Fuel Insurance (UK)

Role Details

Job Title: Campaigner: Fossil Fuel Insurance (UK)

Salary: £31,200 pro rata FTE

Hours: 21 hours per week (3 days)

Place of work: Remote

Contract type: Permanent

Application closing date:  Tuesday 18th April (midnight)

Interview date: Thursday 27th April

Start date (negotiable): 26th June

Job Purpose

You will play a key role in ending insurance cover for fossil fuel projects by challenging the world’s biggest energy insurer, Lloyd’s of London, and its members. This new unique role will also leverage CAN’s insurance campaigning capacities to win critical fights against UK coal mines. Your work will centre frontline communities impacted by coal and fossil fuel projects and amplify their voices.

You will work in a team alongside three other insurance campaigners, liaising as necessary with CAN’s UK coal campaigning team. In our non-hierarchical structure you will hold equal agency in decisions affecting the organisation, and, after your probationary period is passed, you will have the option to become a voluntary Co-Director, sharing legal responsibility for the organisation.

If aspects of the Role Description are unfamiliar to you, please see the 'Non-essential' section of the Person Specification for details of what you can learn on the job.

How to Apply

Please read Recruitment pack Fossil Fuel Finance Campaigner (UK)-3 before applying for the role.

This includes Role Responsibilities and Person Specification, a background to the role plus further information on the application process.

Deadline for applications is midnight Tuesday 18th April 2023 

  • Please provide a CV and up to two pages of text addressing how you meet the points in the person specification, giving examples of relevant experience (paid or voluntary).
  • Please provide contact details (email and phone number) of two referees who can comment on your suitability for the role (in a paid or voluntary capacity, not a family member or partner/spouse).
  • Please complete and return an Equality and diversity monitoring form.  This will be processed anonymously

Will Wales decide Aberpergwm coal mine fate?

CALL TO ACTION

Location: Cardiff Civil and Family Justice Centre, 2 Park Street, Cardiff, CF10 1ET

Day: Wed 15th March 2023

Time: starts 0930 – ends 10:00am. (The hearing starts at 10.30am)

What:

Demonstration in support of a 2-day court hearing to rule that the Welsh Government can apply its strong policy against coal mining to stop the Aberpergwm coal mine expansion in Glyn Neath. Show up to show the Welsh Government that you care about fossil fuels and the climate change it drives.

What to bring:

Placards and banners about climate change and fossil fuels, particularly coal. Please don’t bring things that have groups’ logos on – we want this demonstration to be about the issue, not about who’s campaigning on it.

Questions?

Email: info@coalaction.org.uk

Find out more about the campaign, including key stats on Aberpergwm coal mine.

Background

Wales won the freedom to decide its own future on coal mining under The Wales Act 2017. The Welsh Government has a strong policy against mining coal on Welsh soil, and we’re here to support that policy being applied to the Aberpergwm coal mine expansion. Since 2021, the Welsh Government has told the press that its hands are tied because of a legal detail about the Aberpergwm expansion application. Yet, the UK Government, the UK Coal Authority, and even the Parliamentary Welsh Affairs Committee Chair all went on record to say it is for the Welsh Government to decide the fate of the licence to expand the Aberpergwm coal mine. Neither side could agree, and during months of finger-pointing in the press, neither side sought a definitive legal ruling on it either—and the Aberpergwm coal mine extension slipped through.

So Coal Action Network has crowdfunded this judicial review in the hope that the Cardiff Court finds the Welsh Government’s approval is needed for the Aberpergwm expansion licence to be valid. The Welsh Government will then be free to apply its policy against coal to create a greener, cleaner future for Wales.

Published: 28.02.23

Thousands tell Probitas: Break up with Adani

A Valentines surprise from the #StopAdani movement

Today we delivered Coedie's message and thousands others from around the world in the form of 6ft tall talking valentines cards, to all three of Probitas 1492's UK offices: Lloyds of London, Lime Street (London), and Manchester.

We want to make sure they can't ignore indigenous communities, and people all over the planet who will be impacted by this climate bomb. Check out some pictures from our action, your messages, and how to get involved in keeping the pressure on Probitas.

Will you ramp up the pressure on Probitas?

We need to show Probitas that the global movement against Adani won’t let them get away with their involvement. Will you join us and ramp up the pressure we’re placing on them?

We're asking our supporters to sign up to take regular action, emailing staff at Probitas over their companies role in enabling this carbon bomb. We'll be sending you new contact details at every few days – no two people will be receiving the same staff to contact. This tactic means that together we can contact more staff, and be as effective as possible in turning up the heat. Let's convince them to stop insuring climate breakdown.

As always, we'll be providing you with example emails to use & help along the way.

💥 Fill in this form to sign up & start contacting Probitas staff straight away!

When we’ve taken action together, the #StopAdani movement has won against insurers and brokers again and again - now the industry knows it's one of the most controversial projects in the world. We need to make sure this climate-wrecking project has nowhere left to go.

Let’s make sure Probitas knows what it’s getting into: send your message today.

Petition delivered to the Welsh Government: call in and reject this coal mine!

In September 2022, Ffos-y-fran opencast coal mine's 15-year planning permission ran out and the coal mine was due to close and restoration begin. However, Merthyr (South Wales) Ltd applied for a S73 time extension to mine coal at the site for a 9 months, with an intention to submit a further application for a 3-year expansion.

But this climate calamity can't go ahead! Today, Thursday 12th January, Chris and Alyson, who live close to the Ffos-y-fran coal mine, delivered our petition of over 20,000 signatures to the Welsh Government's The Planning and Environment Decisions Wales. The petition demands that the Welsh Government:

  1. 'calls in' the decision if the local Council considers granting planning permission to expand the Ffos-y-fran opencast coal mine, in recognition of the wider impacts.
  2. acts on climate science, listens to local residents, and follows its own laws and policies, such as the Well-being of Future Generations Act, to swiftly reject expanding the UK’s largest opencast coal mine
  3. includes workers on a Universal Basic Income pilot, and invests in jobs with a future.
Published: 12/01/2023

Key facts: illegal Ffos-y-fran opencast coal mine expansion

Find out more about how the Ffos-y-fran coal mine has managed to illegally siphon coal out for 16 months without being stopped.

Key facts & figures for 16 months of illegal coal mining

06 September 2022 - 08 January 2024

Coal sold: 64o million tonnes (company-reported volumes published in official Coal Authority statistics)

CO2 from coal use: 2.02 million tonnes of CO2 (2022 BEIS Conversion Factors)

Methane from the mine itself: 2,900 tonnes (Global Energy Monitor)

CO2e from the mine itself: 931,000 tonnes in 2021 (reported by the company on p4 (7) for machinery, electricity, and gas combustion)

Coal operator: Merthyr (South Wales) Ltd – formerly Miller Argent Holdings Limited, subsidiary of Merthyr Holdings Limited – which is owned by Gwent Investments Limited

Parent company: Gwent Holdings Limited, owned by Mrs J H Lewis

Type: Thermal coal, some of which is ‘upgraded’ to be sold to steelworks

Mining method: Opencast

Claimed destination: steelworks, domestic heating, cement production etc.

Local Planning Authority: Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council

Address: Ffos-y-fran Land Reclamation Scheme, East Of Merthyr Tydfil CF48 4AE

Time: 15 years, then a further 16 months illegally

Published: 17/08/2022 Updated: 25/01/2024

Santa delivers Christmas coal to Gove for Whitehaven approval

Cumbria mine puts gove on naughty list: santas deliver sacks of ‘coal’ to him at his whitehall office.

  • Michael Gove is put on the naughty list for Cumbria Whitehaven mine; a gang of Santas delivers coal to Gove’s Whitehall office on behalf of Coal Action Network and Lush Cosmetics in a festive protest.
  • Gove has been criticised by his own party, the Government’s own Climate Change Committee, Industry Leaders, and Environmental groups.

On Wednesday (21/12/2022) a gang of Santas delivered sacks of ‘naughty list coal’ to Michael Gove at his Department of Levelling Up, Housing, and Communities office in Whitehall on behalf of Coal Action Network and Lush cosmetics.  Holding signs reading “Christmas coal for climate criminal Gove ”, and “No new coal”, the festive action was in protest against the recent Whitehaven coal mine approval.

Since Gove announced his approval of the Whitehaven coal mine application on 7th December, he has been heavily criticised by members of his own party, the Government’s own Climate Change Committee, industry leaders, and environmental groups. Over the original coal mine timeline, the coal operator would mine 64 million tonnes of coal, resulting in 200 million tonnes of CO2, and 340 thousand tonnes of potent climate change accelerant, methane.

Gove’s 15-page letter outlining his reasons for approving the Whitehaven coal mine has already been left in tatters by steel industry leaders who have said British Steelworks can’t rely on Whitehaven coal as it’s too high in polluting sulphur. Gove’s justification was dealt another blow when Owen Hewlett, the chief technical officer of Gold Standard offsetting, called the idea of making the coal mine carbon-neutral through Gold Standard offsetting “obviously nonsense, morally nonsense and technically insane”.

Coal Action Network said “We’re here because Santa knows who’s been naughty and nice, and Gove’s top of the naughty list for approving the Whitehaven coal mine. If more coal mines are really Gove’s only levelling up offer, Santa’s got a message for him this Christmas: climate change only levels down. It’s a dead-end industry distracting from the levelling up potential of jobs with a future.”

Lush campaigns manager Andrew Butler says, “Lush will be Santa for lots of people this Christmas and while we usually provide nice presents, Gove is firmly on our naughty list. But to say Gove has been naughty is a gross understatement. His reckless decision to approve a new coal mine in West Cumbria puts us all on the path to climate catastrophe and makes extreme weather like the floods that displaced tens of millions of people in Pakistan more likely. Gove is not just naughty, he is a climate criminal.”

In a joint statement Coal Action Network and Lush Santas say, “We must remember that individuals are making these decisions that cost us billions, our quality of life, and our very future. Where is the individual accountability for that? Families are freezing in their homes this winter because someone in Government effectively stopped the home insulation programme around a decade ago. Instead of holding that person responsible and reversing that damage, Gove approves a coal mine for a steel industry that doesn’t want it, derailing our climate promises. Santa is all about individual accountability and doesn’t care if someone hides behind a Ministerial title—so these sacks of ‘coal’ are delivered to Michael Gove personally this Xmas.”

Published 23/12/2022

Flawed grounds of Michael Gove’s shock approval of the Whitehaven coal mine

Flawed grounds of Michael Gove’s shock approval of the Whitehaven coal mine

The UK Government has produced a 15 page letter plus appendices which outlines the reasons for granting permission to the Whitehaven coal mine application (Ref: 4/17/9007). This is mostly in the form of highlighting points on which Michael Gove agrees with the Planning Inspector , Stephen Normington, who also recommended granting permission for the application.

We have criticisms of each argument and are left wondering who’s interests really underpin Gove’s shock decision to approve the coal mine...

The arguments, and their problems

1) 'Demand for coking coal will continue in the UK and Europe’s steelworks until 2040 at least'

Tata steelworks in Port Talbot has publicly called on the UK Government to co-fund its transition to Electric Arc Furnace steel production which uses little or no coal—or it has warned it’ll shut down in 2023. Tata is the largest steelworks in the UK.

2) 'It is important for supply security to mine coking coal for UK steelworks'

British steel industry chiefs have further said that British and European steelworks will be largely unable to use Whitehaven coal as it is too high in sulphur.

3) 'Emissions from the coal being burned isn’t relevant to the decision'

This involves some mental gymnastics, but essentially—it’s based on flawed reasoning that because West Cumbria Coal Mining Ltd can’t control how steelworks use the coal, it isn’t responsible for the resulting emissions. If end-use emissions can’t be a reason to refuse the coal mine, neither can end-use be a reason to approve the coal mine, yet end-use is precisely the basis for the coal mine’s approval.

4) 'Even if emissions from coal use was relevant, it wouldn’t create any overall increase in emissions'

This absurdity is based on coal industry testimony referring to supposed ‘swing suppliers’ of coal in the USA. Not only is this potentially biased and based on one country, it also wasn’t demonstrated that the market it responsive enough to reduce supply with Whitehaven’s production. Yet, Gove’s claim that emissions won’t increase is based on substitution that largely relies on this unsubstantiated testimony. It also rest on the notion that ‘if we don’t do it, someone else will’—an approach if everyone took, would mean no one would ever take action to reduce emissions and large parts of the world would become uninhabitable.

5) 'The coal mine seeks to be net-CO2 neutral'

Gove’s letter is careful not to say the coal mine will be net-CO2 neutral, only that it’ll seek to be—because, like all greenwash, it’s quickly shown to be empty promises to justify climate-trashing business as normal. Issues with off-setting aside, the off-setting scheme the coal mine cited in its application publicly rejected working with a coal mine soon after, and the head of Offsetting Gold Standard called the idea of offsetting a coal mine “nonsense”. Whitehaven coal mine will emit 340,000 tonnes of climate accelerating methane, only some of which is intended to be captured, and even the coal operator admits this will only start 4 years into the project.

6) 'Steelworks will be decarbonised partly through carbon capture and storage'

Given the weakness of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) and despite the billions pumped into its research and promotion so far, the only way to achieve steelworks decarbonisation will be removing coking coal from steelmaking. CCS has done little more than to continue business-as-normal by gambling on a largely unproven, expensive, energy-intensive technology that may create a future time-bomb and is yet to capture 100% of emissions anywhere.

7) 'The coal mine will negatively affect views from the busy coast-to-coast pathway'

Gove admits that the Coast-to-Coast pathway that beings in Whitehaven will be significantly and negatively impacted by the coal mine structures. This pathway draws tourism to the area.

8) 'The coal mine will not significantly reduce tourism to the area'

Gove’s conclusion that tourism won’t be significantly reduced seems incompatible with admitting the coal mine would have a significantly negative effect on the leading draw for tourism to the area, the Coast-to-Coast pathway.

9) 'The coal mine will create significant economic benefits to the area and the UK economy'

Arguments for the economic benefits to the area from the coal mine does not consider the costs to the economy from climate change, reduced tourism, and the distraction this creates from supporting sustainable industries creating jobs for the future. It is also based on assumptions such as workers relocating rather than commuting for work at the coal mine.

10) 'The coal mine has an unacceptable impact on the landscape justified by economic benefit'

It’s recognised that the landscape impact from above-ground structures is unacceptable. Yet, without any details, this ‘unacceptable impact’ is somehow quantified into a price, and that is weighed as worth less than the supposed economic benefit of the coal mine. This isn’t a technical decision—it is wholly subjective about what we consider the environment to be worth.

11) 'The coal mine will be restored with the result that the area will be better than before'

The subject of recent research by Coal Action Network, the UK is littered with under-restored or unrestored coal mines—right now, Merthyr (South Wales) Ltd is threatening to walk away from the UK’s largest coal mine without completing the restoration promised. The promise of restoration is rarely one that is kept and cannot be relied on. The ecosystem, and the lives supported by it, currently on the land also won’t be put back—it is as unique as each of us, and will be lost forever. The idea that a new one will be the same as the old one, that ecosystems and lives are interchangeable, is a subjective view to justify its termination.

Published: 13/12/2022

New research: coal mine restoration in Wales

Click the image or here for the full report

Summary

Countless communities across the UK were - and still are - being sold a lie by their Local Planning Authorities and mining companies.

This report combines field and desk-based research to reveal the continuing failure of Local Planning Authorities to honour promises made to local communities about how, and when, nearby opencast coal mines would be restored. The research finds that mining companies have consistently evaded restoration costs, and continue to hold Local Planning Authorities to ransom in funding even the bare minimum restoration which would otherwise bankrupt County Councils who would be lumbered with a financial liability amounting to tens of millions. Field research indicates that event those sites which Local Planning Authorities have confirmed by email to be fully restored contains uncovered and leaking storage tanks of industrial chemicals, abandoned warehouses, concrete platforms, and no-go zones sectioned off with barbed wire. COP26 broke new ground, with claims the UK would 'move beyond coal' - but we risk leaving behind communities that cannot ‘move beyond coal’ as they continue to live with the localised impacts of a natural environment ravaged by up to 80 years of opencast coal mining. It is in this context, that we provide an update to some of the findings within the 2014 report on the state of coal mine restoration in South Wales, commissioned by the Welsh Government.

We hope this research will spark renewed calls for the vital restoration work still required, ensure plans for the restoration of coal tips is accompanied by restoration of voids, and sound a warning against consideration given to new or extended coal mining in South Wales and beyond.

Recommendations

  1. A fresh and independent assessment is needed to cost the task of properly remediating poorly restored and unrestored opencast coal mines in South Wales (and across the UK). It is then incumbent upon the Welsh and UK Governments to provide those funds to secure the restoration promised to local communities. A well-resourced and supported taskforce will be needed to facilitate this process and see restoration works through to completion.
  2. Key restoration decisions must be led by local communities and guided by the independent advice of Natural Resources Wales.
  3. Coal tips should be addressed together with voids remaining from opencast coal mining, rather than approached in isolation. 2,456 coal tips litter Wales. 2021 saw fresh calls for their reclamation amid fears of another Aberfan tragedy if the coal tips become unstable, estimated to cost £500-£600 million. Some restoration schemes remedy nearby coal tips whereas other poorly restored coal mines effectively create new coal tips, such as the overburden now to be left at the exopencast coal mine, Nant Helen. For this reason, coal tips and voids cannot be addressed in isolation.
  4. In the interests of transparency and accessibility, all planning authorities should make all Planning Officers’ reports available online and clearly identified alongside associated planning documents. Neath Port Talbot County Council Planning Authority, for example, confirmed it does not make their Planning Officers’ reports routinely available online. Planning Officers’ reports are generally written in more lay terms than, and comprehensively summarise, sometimes 100s of, highly technical documents associated with that application. The content of, and recommendation within, Planning Officers’ reports also greatly influence the outcome of a planning committee’s decision.

Twitter-Storm against Cumbria coking coal mine