<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Coal Action Network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coalaction.org.uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coalaction.org.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 16:16:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>UK Coal wont let go</title>
		<link>http://coalaction.org.uk/uk-coal-wont-let-go/</link>
		<comments>http://coalaction.org.uk/uk-coal-wont-let-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 16:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bradley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[durham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[london]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk coal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coalaction.org.uk/?p=1077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Struggling mining company UK Coal are desperate to opencast 556,000 tonnes of coal from Bradley, County Durham. They are taking their application to Judicial Review on 5th June at the London High Court. UK Coal seemed to be going into liquidation voluntarily (according to a report in the Financial Times). Local businesses in the North [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/noconsent.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-842" alt="noconsent" src="http://coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/noconsent-300x100.png" width="300" height="100" /></a></p>
<p>Struggling mining company UK Coal are desperate to opencast 556,000 tonnes of coal from Bradley, County Durham. They are taking their application to Judicial Review on 5th June at the London High Court.</p>
<p>UK Coal seemed to be going into liquidation voluntarily (according to a report in the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6b6d3af6-b1b0-11e2-b324-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2TTGZWTZy">Financial Times</a>). Local businesses in the North are no longer providing tyres as they haven&#8217;t been paid in months and all diesel needs to be paid for up front, at their Potland Burn site. The company is trying to off load its<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-22365848"> pensions</a> obligations to the government for Daw Mill colliery and is failing to <a href="http://www.chad.co.uk/news/local/miners-chief-wants-action-after-uk-coal-escapes-fine-1-5635383">compensate</a> the family of a miner killed at one of their sites. This doesn&#8217;t sound like a company who can be trusted to restore a new site, nor treat their workers and families fairly.<br />
<span id="more-1077"></span></p>
<p>At the original planning hearing in February 2011 councillors unanimously rejected the application, calling UK Coal thugs and vandals, saying that they wouldn&#8217;t be bribed with money towards improving the roads.</p>
<p>UK Coal were not prepared to admit defeat and leave much loved valley alone. They appealed with an Inspectors Inquiry in Autumn 2011 which lasted three weeks, the refusal remained.</p>
<p>Rather than leave the community in peace UK Coal are now going to Judicial Review to contest the inspectors decision.</p>
<p>Local people in the <a href="http://pontvalley.net/cms/index.php?module=pagemaster&amp;PAGE_user_op=view_page&amp;PAGE_id=6&amp;MMN_position=5:5">Pont Valley Network</a> have battled with UK Coal to preserve the area their families enjoy, local wildlife spots, great crested newts, red kites, bats, badgers, open views, historical sites and good health. The site as it is provides all this and more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coalaction.org.uk/uk-coal-wont-let-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speculation over UK Coal</title>
		<link>http://coalaction.org.uk/speculation-over-uk-coal/</link>
		<comments>http://coalaction.org.uk/speculation-over-uk-coal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 14:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coalaction.org.uk/?p=1072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week The Financial Times reported that UK Coal were seeking voluntary liquidation. UK Coal is now disputing this according to the BBC. It seems apparent that UK Coal are in a bad way financially and perhaps they are discussing deals with competitors, so don&#8217;t want word of their plight to put off the fat [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week The Financial Times reported that UK Coal were seeking voluntary liquidation. UK Coal is now disputing this according to the <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/22367799">BBC.</a></p>
<p>It seems apparent that UK Coal are in a bad way financially and perhaps they are discussing deals with competitors, so don&#8217;t want word of their plight to put off the fat cats? Or maybe they are setting  up a new company to run the profitable aspects of the business before liquidation. Whatever is going on it remains clear that this is not a company to trust with your pension nor to restore open cast sites. Lets hope councils realise this and refuse the applications they have  in the pipeline.</p>
<p>Reuters also had this article&#8230;</p>
<p>UPDATE 2-UK Coal strives to save mines after crippling fire</p>
<p>Wed May 1, 2013 12:14pm EDT</p>
<p>* UK Coal in talks with creditors to stay solvent</p>
<p>* Declines to confirm FT report of new debt restructuring offer</p>
<p>* UK industry struggling to survive in tighter market</p>
<p>By John McGarrity</p>
<p>LONDON, May 1 (Reuters) &#8211; Britain&#8217;s largest miner UK Coal said on Wednesday it was in talks with creditors to fend off a collapse that would cost up to 2,000 jobs and force power stations to scramble to cover their fuel needs.</p>
<p>Heading a domestic coal sector that already looks under threat, the miner warned in February that a fire that closed its largest mine, Daw Mill, could harm the viability of the whole company unless it got outside help from government or creditors.</p>
<p>&#8220;We remain positive that we have an underlying profitable business,&#8221; UK Coal, part owned by Coalfield Resources, said in a statement after the Financial Times reported it had proposed a voluntary liquidation and the handing over of its remaining mines to a new company.</p>
<p>for the rest of the story see <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/01/uk-coal-talks-idUSL3N0DI1OR20130501">here. </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coalaction.org.uk/speculation-over-uk-coal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CAN now recording planning breaches</title>
		<link>http://coalaction.org.uk/planning-breaches/</link>
		<comments>http://coalaction.org.uk/planning-breaches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 10:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breaking terms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning breaches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coalaction.org.uk/?p=1060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone living close to an operational coal site knows that sites are often run differently to the terms agreed at planning. Coal companies have also acted before planning has been granted. Often this can have a serious impact on local people and the environment. For example blasting on sites without consent or removal of more [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/bodge-house.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1063" alt="bodge house" src="http://coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/bodge-house-300x225.jpg" width="300" height="225" /></a> Anyone living close to an operational coal site knows that sites are often run differently to the terms agreed at planning. Coal companies have also acted before planning has been granted. Often this can have a serious impact on local people and the environment. For example blasting on sites without consent or removal of more trees or buildings than authorised.</p>
<p>This building was demolished without planning  consent at Lodge House Derbyshire.</p>
<p>If you are aware of such breaches occurring please let us know so that we can compile evidence that the companies cannot be trusted to fulfil their planning obligations, giving us fuel to fight future planning applications.</p>
<p>Find further information and the contact form <a href="http://coalaction.org.uk/planning-breaches-2/">here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coalaction.org.uk/planning-breaches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK Coal are going into voluntary liquidation</title>
		<link>http://coalaction.org.uk/uk-coal-are-going-into-voluntary-liquidation/</link>
		<comments>http://coalaction.org.uk/uk-coal-are-going-into-voluntary-liquidation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 21:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk coal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coalaction.org.uk/?p=1050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Today UK Coal announced it is planning to go into liquidation. UK Coal Operations, part owned by Coalfield Resources, proposes a voluntary liquidation and the handing over of its remaining mines to a new company. UK Coal state that the fire which closed their Daw Mill Colliery, lost the company £260m in coal and [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css"><!--
#toc, .toc, .mw-warning { border: 1px solid rgb(170, 170, 170); background-color: rgb(249, 249, 249); padding: 5px; font-size: 95%; }#toc h2, .toc h2 { display: inline; border: medium none; padding: 0px; font-size: 100%; font-weight: bold; }#toc #toctitle, .toc #toctitle, #toc .toctitle, .toc .toctitle { text-align: center; }#toc ul, .toc ul { list-style-type: none; list-style-image: none; margin-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; text-align: left; }#toc ul ul, .toc ul ul { margin: 0px 0px 0px 2em; }#toc .toctoggle, .toc .toctoggle { font-size: 94%; }body { font-family: 'Times New Roman'; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); widows: 2; font-style: normal; text-indent: 0in; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12pt; text-decoration: none; text-align: left; }table {  }td { border-collapse: collapse; text-align: left; vertical-align: top; }p, h1, h2, h3, li { color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 12pt; text-align: left; }
--></style>
<div>
<p> <a href="http://coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/shipleydigger2small.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1052" alt="Digital StillCamera" src="http://coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/shipleydigger2small-300x224.jpg" width="300" height="224" /></a></p>
<p>Today UK Coal announced it is planning to go into liquidation. UK Coal Operations, part owned by Coalfield Resources, proposes a voluntary liquidation and the handing over of its remaining mines to a new company.</p>
<p>UK Coal state that the fire which closed their Daw Mill Colliery, lost the company £260m in coal and equipment, causing the situation. This comes shortly after Scottish Coal, the UK’s largest coal mining company, went into liquidation, closing all of its mines on the 19th April 2013. Residents surrounding operating UK Coal sites fear that sites will not be restored, leaving dangerous lagoons, environmental issues and scars on the landscape. There is also concern that UK Coal may be able to continue operating under a different name without honouring their obligations on unprofitable sites. The situation raises questions about the viability of the coal industry in the UK, which offers hope for anti-opencast campaigners including those living close to mines and proposed sites. <span id="more-1050"></span></p>
<p dir="ltr">UK Coal still operate two deep mines Kellingsley (North Yorkshire) and Thoresby (Nottinghamshire). They also operate six open cast mines Lodge House (Derbyshire), Potland Burn and Steadsburn (Northumberland), Huntington Lane (Shropshire), Park Wall North, (Co. Durham) and Minorca (Leicestershire). They still have applications with planning or expected at planning for Deanfield (West Yorkshire) Bradley, Co. Durham (awaiting Judicial Review as UK Coal contest their failed appeal) Great Oak (Staffordshire) Shortwood farm (Nottinghamshire) and Marley Hill (Co. Durham); Highthorn, Woodhead, Airey Hill West, Hedley Park, Hathery Lane and Hoodsclose &#8211; all in Northumberland.</p>
<p dir="ltr">According to the <a href="www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013/may/01/uk-largest-coal-producer-voluntary-liquidation">Guardian</a> &#8216;voluntary liquidation would allow a subsidiary to run the firm&#8217;s surviving mines but could pass on the company&#8217;s £540m pension deficit to the UK Pension Protection Fund, which would force losses on some of the company&#8217;s 6,800 savers. If UK Coal fell into insolvency the workforce could see 10% of the value wiped off their pensions. The Pension Protection Fund pays 90% of a pension&#8217;s value to workers yet to reach retirement age, but usually pays out 100% to existing retirees and those with long-term health problems.’ So whilst the bosses are likely to face few penalties workers may also loose out.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coalaction.org.uk/uk-coal-are-going-into-voluntary-liquidation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scottish Coal seeks to walk away from unrestored sites</title>
		<link>http://coalaction.org.uk/scottish-coal-seeks-to-walk-away-from-unrestored-sites/</link>
		<comments>http://coalaction.org.uk/scottish-coal-seeks-to-walk-away-from-unrestored-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 20:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal action scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hargreaves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scottish coal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coalaction.org.uk/?p=1045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scottish Coal ask courts to allow them to walk away from opencast sites as Hargreaves directors set up Restoration Trust on Energy Minister’s behalf Coal Action Scotland media release: for immediate use 24th April 2013 Media contact: media@coalactionscotland.org.uk Scottish Coal ask courts to allow them to walk away from opencast sites as Hargreaves directors set [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Scottish Coal ask courts to allow them to walk away from opencast sites as Hargreaves directors set up Restoration Trust on Energy Minister’s behalf</strong></span></p>
<p>Coal Action Scotland media release: for immediate use 24th April 2013<br />
Media contact: media@coalactionscotland.org.uk</p>
<p>Scottish Coal ask courts to allow them to walk away from opencast sites as Hargreaves directors set up Restoration Trust on Energy Minister’s behalf</p>
<p>Campaigners are outraged by what they say is a despicable petition to the Court of Session in Edinburgh by liquidators acting on behalf of Scottish Coal, that seeks permission to walk away from mine sites and prioritise the payment of liquidators over planning obligations. [1]<br />
<span id="more-1045"></span></p>
<p>In a separate but related development, campaigners have discovered that Fergus Ewing’s new Scottish Mines Restoration Trust, set up to oversee the restoration of derelict sites as actually registered as a limited company by two of Hargreave’s directors, the very company tipped to buy Scottish Coal’s more productive mines. [2]</p>
<p>A Coal Action Scotland member said: “After so many years of destruction to the countryside and community health, Scottish Coal are making sure they’re taking everyone down with them. They are petitioning the Court of Session to allow them and their liquidators to not only abandon their sites and their statutory obligations, but to prioritise the payment of their liquidators over all winding up costs!</p>
<p>This petition was literally bundled through the courts, with only three days allowed for objections rather than the usual eight. It raises some very serious questions that need answering now, and getting these answers is definitely in the public interest. For example, Scottish Coal imply that local authorities would pick up the costs of putting the sites back together.</p>
<p>And then there’s the other story running parallel to this saga. Fergus Ewing announced on the 20th April that the Scottish Government was setting up the Scottish Mines Restoration Trust to facilitate the restoration of opencast mines, Chaired by Professor Russell Griggs. But the Restoration trust was actually registered as a private company on the 16th April, literally the day before Ewing and Griggs briefed MSPs in Parliament and made no mention of this.</p>
<p>It gets worse: the trust was registered with two directors, Iain Cockburn and Steve MacQuarrie, Group Finance Director and Group Company Secretary for Hargreves, the very opencast mining and waste disposal company currently tipped to buy Scottish Coal’s productive sites. How can Ewing say “we are setting up a new trust” when it’s entirely controlled by yet another private mining company?”</p>
<p>Scottish Coal’s petition to the court of session also raises questions about the company’s finances since its last financial report was issued. In 2011 the company registered assets of £217 million, but in 2013 that figure has since reduced to £55 million [3]. There is no explanation offered for the £162 million difference, what the assets were or where they have gone in that time.</p>
<p>Despite further announcements from Fergus Ewing yesterday about a new task force on opencast mining that will engage with local communities, to date no engagement or consultation has taken place with any communities impacted by opencast mining and these new developments. In response, a meeting is being held on the 1st May in the Scottish Parliament hosted by the Green Party to be attended by members of communities impacted by the operations.</p>
<p>Notes to Editors:</p>
<p>[1] See sections 10.2.1 to 10.2.5<br />
[2] Information obtained from the Certificate of Incorporation of a Private Limited Company, Company no. 447797<br />
[3] See sections 5.1.2 – 5.3.1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coalaction.org.uk/scottish-coal-seeks-to-walk-away-from-unrestored-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scottish Coal go into Liquidation</title>
		<link>http://coalaction.org.uk/scottish-coal-go-into-liquidation/</link>
		<comments>http://coalaction.org.uk/scottish-coal-go-into-liquidation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coalaction.org.uk/?p=1039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“In light of Scottish Coal’s poor trading and financial position, we have had to cease trading with immediate effect,” -Blair Nimmo, joint provisional liquidator and head of restructuring at KPMG in Scotland. Scottish Coal, the UK’s biggest coal producer, has announced on Friday that they are entering administration. Due to recent “significant cash flow pressures” [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/coal-site.jpg"><img src="http://coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/coal-site-300x199.jpg" alt="coal site" width="300" height="199" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1040" /></a>    “In light of Scottish Coal’s poor trading and financial position, we have had to cease trading with immediate effect,”<br />
    -Blair Nimmo, joint provisional liquidator and head of restructuring at KPMG in Scotland.</p>
<p>Scottish Coal, the UK’s biggest coal producer, has announced on Friday that they are entering administration. Due to recent “significant cash flow pressures” they have laid-off 600 workers and stopped all production at their six open cast sites.<br />
<span id="more-1039"></span><br />
New open cast sites are unlikely to happen, and this is something to be happy about. However, 600 people have lost their jobs, and they won’t be the money men at the top, but the workers with little safety net. They have also had their last week of wages stolen, as this won’t be paid. For those living next to existing or unrestored sites this means scars on the landscape that are unlikely to be fixed any time soon. It’s time to get angry, and take back the land and wages that Scottish Coal bosses have stolen.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013/apr/19/scottish-coal-cuts-600-jobshttp://">Guardian Article</a><br />
<a href="http://www.carlukegazette.co.uk/news/local-headlines/clydesdale-job-losses-scottish-coal-in-liquidation-1-2903118">Carluke Gazette</a><br />
<a href="http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/600-job-losses-confirmed-as-scottish-coal-enters-liquidation.1366397387">Herald Scotland</a><br />
<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-business-22225943">BBC News</a></p>
<p>More information and analysis from Coal Action Scotland is expected shortly. Watch this space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coalaction.org.uk/scottish-coal-go-into-liquidation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>!Victory! Dearne Lea Opencast Refused</title>
		<link>http://coalaction.org.uk/victory-dearne-lea-opencast-refused/</link>
		<comments>http://coalaction.org.uk/victory-dearne-lea-opencast-refused/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 11:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coalaction.org.uk/?p=1012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A CONTROVERSIAL plan to resume open cast mining near Clayton West was rejected this week. Gordon Harrison Ltd wanted to extract 190,000 tonnes of coal and 40,000 tonnes of fireclay from land between the village and Bretton Hall Park. Many people objected to the application including local residents, English Heritage, Wakefield Council, Skelmanthorpe Action Group [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/YSP.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1015" title="YSP" src="http://coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/YSP-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a>A CONTROVERSIAL plan to resume open cast mining near Clayton West was rejected this week.</p>
<p>Gordon Harrison Ltd wanted to extract 190,000 tonnes of coal and 40,000 tonnes of fireclay from land between the village and Bretton Hall Park.<br />
<span id="more-1012"></span><br />
Many people objected to the application including local residents, English Heritage, Wakefield Council, Skelmanthorpe Action Group and West Yorkshire Archaeology Advisory Service, who say there is the potential for late prehistoric/Roman and medieval period remains on the site.</p>
<p>The planning officers recommended the scheme was refused.</p>
<p>Clr Paul Kane, chair of the planning committee said: “I can’t see any special circumstances for opencast mining. The reason I asked about the worth of the coal is because there’ll be £3-4m profit on that and they’ve offered £40,000 to the community, it’s ridiculous. The area is a jewel in the crown and while Bretton Hall and the Yorkshire Sculpture Park may be in Wakefield we don’t want to approve anything that may be detrimental to attracting people here.”</p>
<p>Councillors listed the greenbelt, visual amenity, landscape impact, heritage impact and highways concerns as reasons for rejecting the application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coalaction.org.uk/victory-dearne-lea-opencast-refused/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sheffield City Council set to face second legal action.</title>
		<link>http://coalaction.org.uk/sheffield-city-council-set-to-face-second-legal-action/</link>
		<comments>http://coalaction.org.uk/sheffield-city-council-set-to-face-second-legal-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 09:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coalaction.org.uk/?p=1007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cowley Residents Action Group (CRAG) have instructed their legal representatives, Richard Buxton, to instigate legal action against Sheffield City Council following its decision to grant planning permission to RecyCoal Ltd to reclaim coal from the former Hesley Wood Spoil Heap at Chapeltown. The decision to take legal action is based upon the councils failure to [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p dir="ltr">Cowley Residents Action Group (CRAG) have instructed their legal representatives, Richard Buxton, to instigate legal action against Sheffield City Council following its decision to grant planning permission to RecyCoal Ltd to reclaim coal from the former Hesley Wood Spoil Heap at Chapeltown.</p>
<p dir="ltr">The decision to take legal action is based upon the councils failure to take full account of the impact of the development on air quality as Sheffield is an Air Quality Action Zone and the planning framework requires them to take full account of air quality in the decision making process which appears not to be the case in this application. The council also refused to undertake a Health Impact Assessment despite this being recommended by the Director of Public Health.</p>
<p><span id="more-1007"></span></p>
<p dir="ltr">As of the 1st April  2013  local authorities have the responsibility for public health and consequently health impact assessments are an internal activity for councils.</p>
<p dir="ltr">A similar scheme, Deanfield at Crofton, West Yorkshire has been deferred by the council until such a health assessment has been undertaken, whilst a scheme near Bretton Country Park has been refused because of concerns raised about the potential community benefits of such a scheme and damage to tourism.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coalaction.org.uk/sheffield-city-council-set-to-face-second-legal-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Events Against Great Oak Opencast</title>
		<link>http://coalaction.org.uk/events-against-great-oak-opencast/</link>
		<comments>http://coalaction.org.uk/events-against-great-oak-opencast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flooding disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great oak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opencast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk coal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coalaction.org.uk/?p=988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What’s On In aid of Campaign Against Great Oak Opencast (C.A.G.O.O.) For information about the campaign see here.    Family Acoustics Afternoon Saturday 6th April 2013 1.00pm until 5.00pm The Boughey Arms, Nantwich Road, Audley An Amazing Family Afternoon of Amateur and Professional Acoustic/Vocal Sessions from a variety of local talent this event is an ideal [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>What’s On<a href="http://coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Diglakememorial1.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-989" title="Diglakememorial" src="http://coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Diglakememorial1-251x300.jpg" alt="" width="251" height="300" /></a></h1>
<h3>In aid of Campaign Against Great Oak Opencast (C.A.G.O.O.)</h3>
<p>For information about the campaign see <a href="http://coalaction.org.uk/local-contacts/campaign-against-great-oak-opencast/campaign-news-great-oak/">here.</a></p>
<p><strong>   Family Acoustics Afternoon</strong><br />
Saturday 6th April 2013<br />
1.00pm until 5.00pm<br />
The Boughey Arms, Nantwich Road, Audley</p>
<h5>An Amazing Family Afternoon of Amateur and Professional Acoustic/Vocal Sessions from a variety of local talent this event is an ideal opportunity for you to showcase your musical talents and help raise funds for the Campaign Against Great Oak Opencast.</h5>
<p><span id="more-988"></span></p>
<h5>No matter what your age or ability if you would like to take part or find out more then please get in touch on: 07792221351 or 01782723678 or Email: clairehansbury1@hotmail.co.uk</h5>
<p>Please feel free to write your own songs and music too, perhaps relate them to your thoughts on the proposed opencast site. We are open to listening to bands too. The first event in aid of C.A.G.O.O. has already created much attention from bands wanting recognition. We hope to involve the local media, so you never know you may be on the radio or in the newspapers, all of which could be great for your portfolios! We look forward to hearing from you.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3 dir="ltr" data-font-name="g_font_p0_1" data-canvas-width="58.96800175738335"><strong>May</strong></h3>
<div dir="ltr" data-font-name="g_font_p0_1" data-canvas-width="106.04224316030502">Sunday 5th May 2013 7.00pm until 10.00pm</div>
<div dir="ltr" data-font-name="g_font_p0_1" data-canvas-width="500.5168149165631"><strong>Evening of Respect and Remembrance, Photos, History and Poetry from The Diglake Flood Disaster of Bignall End.</strong></div>
<div dir="ltr" data-font-name="g_font_p0_1" data-canvas-width="278.1840082905292"><strong>Audley &amp; District Community Centre, Castle Hill, Nantwich Road, Audley.</strong></div>
<div dir="ltr" data-font-name="g_font_p0_2" data-canvas-width="719.4560214414595"><strong>We have poetry from 1895 to present time and welcome volunteer readers of all ages to</strong></div>
<div dir="ltr" data-font-name="g_font_p0_2" data-canvas-width="351.8720104866028"><strong>make this night a success.</strong></div>
<div dir="ltr" data-font-name="g_font_p0_2" data-canvas-width="602.4960179557797">We also welcome your current poem submissions about your thoughts on an opencast mine going ahead on the clairehansbury1@hotmail.co.uk or send to address 104 Ravens Lane Bignall End Stoke -on-Trent with your name, age, and contact telephone number, unless you wish to remain anonymous. Your poem will be read on the night by you or one of our volunteers, whomever you choose.</div>
<p>PLEASE GET IN TOUCH AS SOON AS YOU CAN.<br />
All proceeds to the Campaign Against Great Oak Opencast. Just turn up on the night and please give generously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coalaction.org.uk/events-against-great-oak-opencast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Walk to Prevent UK Coal Opencasting Graves</title>
		<link>http://coalaction.org.uk/walk-to-prevent-uk-coal-opencasting-graves/</link>
		<comments>http://coalaction.org.uk/walk-to-prevent-uk-coal-opencasting-graves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diglake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great oak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coalaction.org.uk/?p=916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/great_oak_mining_plans.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-917" title="great_oak_mining_plans" src="http://coalaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/great_oak_mining_plans.jpg" alt="" width="435" height="615" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coalaction.org.uk/walk-to-prevent-uk-coal-opencasting-graves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
